HomeJudgment

A realistic job preview that also scores.

Filmed, first-person scenarios built from your own critical incidents. The candidate is the camera: they see the customer, the shift, the pressure, and the moment the decision lands on them. They see what the job is really like before they accept it, which means fewer surprised new hires and fewer early exits. And because the scenarios are yours, what you score is the job itself.

6 weeksfrom your material to a live, filmed instrument
9 gateseach closed by a named approver on your side
Fairness-testedevery item checked for bias across groups before release

01 · One scenario. Any world.

Same decision, same key, new world.

Once a scenario is validated, our production line can re-skin it for any industry, region or cast. The decision points, response options and scoring keys never change. That is the validity you are paying for, and re-skinning is designed to protect it.

Three renders of the same validated scenario. Judge for yourself.
ORIGINAL Base scenario
RESKIN 01 Stylized 3D
RESKIN 02 Regional: Gulf

02 · Built for your job

Your situations, your competencies, in six weeks.

We start from material you already have: job descriptions, performance narratives, and interviews with the people doing the work. Critical incidents are drawn from that material and mapped to competencies before a single item is written. Then come the scenarios and graded response options, a review covering reading level, bias across six dimensions, social desirability and construct fit, then the scoring key, then the film.

  1. Week 1

    Blueprint

    Your material, your competency model, and the measurement plan agreed before anything is written.

  2. Weeks 2–3

    Scenarios and items

    Scenarios and graded response options, then the full review battery.

  3. Week 4

    Scoring key

    The SME panel derives and approves the key, weighted by expert agreement.

  4. Weeks 5–6

    Filmed and live

    Production, implementation, delivery, with the full technical documentation handed over.

Scoring that respects consensus

Penalties are weighted by expert agreement. Deviating from a unanimous key costs the candidate; hedging to the midpoint no longer pays. The result is sharper score distributions and more defensible decisions.

What we need from you

One subject-matter expert for a few conversations across the six weeks, and two reviewers to read what comes back. Everything else is ours.

A manual, every time

Where each scenario came from, who approved it, how the key was derived, and what the fairness testing found. Most SJTs never get this.

03 · Why it holds together

Every person in that film was written down first.

Each character is described, approved by a psychologist, then locked. That text drives every frame they appear in, in every language, so the cast never changes between scenes, takes or markets.

Ngozi Okafor

Full build, deep brown skin, hair in a low bun; loose teal blouse, flat sandals, small black crossbody bag.

Abdullah Hassan

Medium build, warm tan skin, square face; pressed navy uniform shirt with black epaulettes, steel-rimmed glasses.

Elena Vasquez

Age band 38–42, medium build, dark brown shoulder-length hair; navy blazer over a cream blouse, thin-framed glasses.

Priya Shah

Age band 30–35, petite build, straight black shoulder-length hair; maroon crew-neck blouse, small silver nose stud.

And the scenes they were written for.

Ngozi Okafor and Abdullah Hassan, at the counter
Elena Vasquez and Priya Shah, in the conference room
The four-family finding, the score-key method and 512 fairness tests are on the science page The evidence →
Back to← Home PreviousPersonality NextReasoning →

Next step

Tell us the role you're hiring for.

The fastest way to see what this looks like is to give us one job. Send a job description and we'll show you what the first scenario looks like for it.